Rod comparison
Moderators: pmcroberts, uniphasian
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 12/24/20 10:41
Rod comparison
#1Hi CFRF,
I’m new to the forum. I’m interested in fly fishing for stream trout with a bamboo fly rod. As I continue my research, I wanted to get a quick comparison of a few rods. Which of these rods do you feel is better quality overall ? Thanks
South Bend 346
South Bend 359
Goodwin Granger Special GS9653
Heddon Model 13 8’6”
I’m new to the forum. I’m interested in fly fishing for stream trout with a bamboo fly rod. As I continue my research, I wanted to get a quick comparison of a few rods. Which of these rods do you feel is better quality overall ? Thanks
South Bend 346
South Bend 359
Goodwin Granger Special GS9653
Heddon Model 13 8’6”
-
- Master Guide
- Posts: 442
- Joined: 02/21/16 18:52
Re: Rod comparison
#2Granger, Heddon and then South Bend rods. For 1st bamboo rod - I’d suggest trying shorter, lighter rods to get best experience on qualities that bamboo rods can provide.
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 12/24/20 10:41
-
- Bamboo Fanatic
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 01/22/17 17:05
- Location: Utah
Re: Rod comparison
#4The 9653 is a BIG water rod made for chucking BIG flies. The 346 and 359 have the same taper, with the 346 being a slightly higher grade rod (may have more guides) the Heddon 13 or the SBs would make fine bigger water rods, but if you fish creeks, you'll want something in the 6'6" - 7'6" range
Re: Rod comparison
#5In terms of fit and finish I would rate them: 1)Granger, 2)Heddon, and 3)South Bend.
When discussing South Bends, I suggest eliminating the 1950's production whenever possible. Of the two South Bends, the 346 is the better grade, having more guides and a better seat. Ferrules should be about the same, as should cane work. When you're looking at a South Bend 50-series rod you're seeing their entry-level models, though the 59's (159/59/359) are the better of the 50's. If you can, buy a pre-1941 346 since pre-war rods are nicer.
For 8 1/2' rods for fishing, I like all the South Bend dry fly models, which I have always felt were a relative bargain.
When discussing South Bends, I suggest eliminating the 1950's production whenever possible. Of the two South Bends, the 346 is the better grade, having more guides and a better seat. Ferrules should be about the same, as should cane work. When you're looking at a South Bend 50-series rod you're seeing their entry-level models, though the 59's (159/59/359) are the better of the 50's. If you can, buy a pre-1941 346 since pre-war rods are nicer.
For 8 1/2' rods for fishing, I like all the South Bend dry fly models, which I have always felt were a relative bargain.
Re: Rod comparison
#6How do you define a stream?bigrivertrout wrote: ↑12/26/20 08:06Hi CFRF,
I’m new to the forum. I’m interested in fly fishing for stream trout with a bamboo fly rod. As I continue my research, I wanted to get a quick comparison of a few rods. Which of these rods do you feel is better quality overall ? Thanks
South Bend 346
South Bend 359
Goodwin Granger Special GS9653
Heddon Model 13 8’6”
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 12/24/20 10:41
Re: Rod comparison
#7Thanks for the feedback gents.
By stream, I mean a small river that is less than 100 feet wide
By stream, I mean a small river that is less than 100 feet wide
Re: Rod comparison
#9To encompass the casting needed for streams on the larger size, as well as giving good service on the small to medium, Granger 8642s would be more versatile and much easier on the pocketbook.
I would also not shy away from a clean SB323 8 1/2'- a great rod! It's a softer action than the 346. While I'm at it, a Steve Pennington rod is also a good intro to bamboo.
I would also not shy away from a clean SB323 8 1/2'- a great rod! It's a softer action than the 346. While I'm at it, a Steve Pennington rod is also a good intro to bamboo.
Re: Rod comparison
#10I've owned GG 8040s and still fish a 8642, both are good suggestions. I would add a couple of Orvis rods, a 7 1/2' 3 7/8 oz. 2 pc. five wt., they are available, reasonably priced and hold their value well. The second an 8' 4 1/8 oz. 2 pc. which are harder to find but for me a great DT5F/WF6F rod.
- flyfishingpastor
- Bamboo Fanatic
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: 07/12/07 18:00
- Location: Eastern Washington State
Re: Rod comparison
#11I guess I'd suggest that you fish the rod you like and cast best.
It's difficult to suggest otherwise because the rods you have selected will work perfectly as intended, depending upon what you fish for and your casting stroke. I always suggest trying some examples of the rods you are considering and actually purchase the rod that most fits your casting style. Every rod is unique in small or BIG ways. Enjoy the search and fish the one you enjoy casting most.
Pat
It's difficult to suggest otherwise because the rods you have selected will work perfectly as intended, depending upon what you fish for and your casting stroke. I always suggest trying some examples of the rods you are considering and actually purchase the rod that most fits your casting style. Every rod is unique in small or BIG ways. Enjoy the search and fish the one you enjoy casting most.
Pat
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 12/24/20 10:41
Re: Rod comparison
#12Thanks for all the input.
Here is an update. I possess the South Bend 346, the South Bend 359, and the Goodwin Granger Special GS9653. All three need some refurb work, namely new guides and a little work/clean up on the ferrules.
I can trade these 3 plus some cash for a refurbished Heddon Model 13 8’6”.
Here is an update. I possess the South Bend 346, the South Bend 359, and the Goodwin Granger Special GS9653. All three need some refurb work, namely new guides and a little work/clean up on the ferrules.
I can trade these 3 plus some cash for a refurbished Heddon Model 13 8’6”.